1
Isolation room / Re: A chatroom for isolated members
« on: January 06, 2023, 05:35:26 pm »
I am a prisoner in a dictatorship
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
2
Isolation room / Re: A chatroom for isolated members
« on: December 09, 2022, 06:54:14 am »We both have multiple accounts and i don't see any problem in that. Why do you see problems?
Because being two versus one is not okay.
3
Debates, Interviews / Re: Mafia conspiracy
« on: October 16, 2022, 08:52:09 am »
Thirdly you say something that i didn't understand. Sounds like you are doing some kind of Researching thing, that is fine, but what is the my part in it and what kind of labels do you mention and what do you mean? Me has no role here, this forum is not about me and not for me. Your goals should be to give something for the society (your "research" for example), and work with your ego and things (like your ego-exercise) but personally someone like me or another forum member shouldn't be in your goals in any way. It is a wows-related forum that discusses also some psychology i would say. But it is not a palce where to feed your ego or do any research related to anyone specific. So ,i am confused what you said and what are your goals. Can you explain in simpler words.
I should have said it better that one would be labled by others. Often in society irregular thoughts are seen down upon and depending on the severity of this 'difference' the one who brings the 'alternative' thought up is ousted by society with the usage of bad words. Studying the philosphy of wows is the goal. Applying myself as having a Phd (even though it is not entirely correct) I feel is better than saying in simple language "I am good at wows" or "I am an expert", since studying philosphy doesn't include any interpretation of 'skill' because it is just a study, while saying "I am an expert" fuels ego. I intend to avoid the ego-part while providing with alternative theories not often discussed elsewhere (or accepted elsewhere).
4
General Discussion / Destroyer conspiracy (Revised version of Mafia conspiracy)
« on: October 16, 2022, 08:08:17 am »
Destroyer conspiracy
Description: If the Destroyers on your team have died there is a much higher probability of a loss even with minimal amounts of ships being destroyed. The criteria is that the enemy team has remaining destroyers with a correlated higher probability that they will win given a higher amount of remaining destroyers. The loss of destroyers on the team will often lead to a faster loss since there are less tools to fight against enemy destroyers, this is because DD vs DD engagements are the most equal, but against other classes it is favoured for the DD. The matchups are these:
DD vs Sub: DDs can use depth charges and are nimble enough to dodge torpedos. The concealment of both are equal.
DD vs DD: Equal fight, luck and matchup (which dd vs which) determines the outcome.
DD vs cruiser: Concealment difference in favour of the DD. DD uses torps (hydro doesn't help since it doesn't last forever). Radar won't matter since it is only active for a few seconds.
DD vs BB: Same as cruiser but guns are more devastating since BBs have slow reload.
DD vs CV: Concealment and nimblesness favours the DD. If the DD remained unspotted for long enough he can sneak up on the carrier.
Rarity: Common
Rarity: Unbearable
Example: All destroyers on your team have been destroyed by one way or another (destroyed in general). This leads to an unfavourable matchup because all classes except DDs have uneven matchup against DDs. Enemy teams DDs use combination of concealment + torpedoes + guns to take key areas and push away the opposing team. In practise this is what can be labled as 'camping' or 'running away' since the DDs are not opposed by counterparts.
Method (ways to reproduce):
1) Select either the class cruiser, BB or CV.
2) Select a battle mode with enemy team consisting of human players (Randoms/Rankeds/Clan-battle)
3) Play and observe what happens when one team loses all of their destroyers.
Comments: You have to play as a cruiser, battleship or carrier to avoid altering the test. Playing as destroyers introduces extra noise since you can alter the results by playing in favour / not in favour of the team. You can also not play submarines since they share the same matchmaking slots as destroyers and we are not testing out what happens when all submarines dies. The test will take much time but is easy to do, you can only monitor games which have DDs and no submarines.
Description: If the Destroyers on your team have died there is a much higher probability of a loss even with minimal amounts of ships being destroyed. The criteria is that the enemy team has remaining destroyers with a correlated higher probability that they will win given a higher amount of remaining destroyers. The loss of destroyers on the team will often lead to a faster loss since there are less tools to fight against enemy destroyers, this is because DD vs DD engagements are the most equal, but against other classes it is favoured for the DD. The matchups are these:
DD vs Sub: DDs can use depth charges and are nimble enough to dodge torpedos. The concealment of both are equal.
DD vs DD: Equal fight, luck and matchup (which dd vs which) determines the outcome.
DD vs cruiser: Concealment difference in favour of the DD. DD uses torps (hydro doesn't help since it doesn't last forever). Radar won't matter since it is only active for a few seconds.
DD vs BB: Same as cruiser but guns are more devastating since BBs have slow reload.
DD vs CV: Concealment and nimblesness favours the DD. If the DD remained unspotted for long enough he can sneak up on the carrier.
Rarity: Common
Rarity: Unbearable
Example: All destroyers on your team have been destroyed by one way or another (destroyed in general). This leads to an unfavourable matchup because all classes except DDs have uneven matchup against DDs. Enemy teams DDs use combination of concealment + torpedoes + guns to take key areas and push away the opposing team. In practise this is what can be labled as 'camping' or 'running away' since the DDs are not opposed by counterparts.
Method (ways to reproduce):
1) Select either the class cruiser, BB or CV.
2) Select a battle mode with enemy team consisting of human players (Randoms/Rankeds/Clan-battle)
3) Play and observe what happens when one team loses all of their destroyers.
Comments: You have to play as a cruiser, battleship or carrier to avoid altering the test. Playing as destroyers introduces extra noise since you can alter the results by playing in favour / not in favour of the team. You can also not play submarines since they share the same matchmaking slots as destroyers and we are not testing out what happens when all submarines dies. The test will take much time but is easy to do, you can only monitor games which have DDs and no submarines.
5
Debates, Interviews / Re: Mafia conspiracy
« on: October 16, 2022, 07:50:07 am »We don't do jokes our things which cause bigger sufferings to others. For exmaple, no jokes about death, diseases, poverty, etc. First it takes time to get used to such attitude but later it becomes like a natural part of you. I for example don't do such Phd-jokes and don't call anyone iditos and i don't need to make any effort for that, it happens automatically. Yes, sometimes i may call by accident or how to say, but i don't remember such "accidents" and they are surely not intentional if they happen.
I am in agreement that one shouldn't be using jokes about death, diseases, poverty, personal attacks, etc on the forum. After reading other posts made by members of this forum it is out of the question, practising such believes that someone should for example 'go kill themselves' is horrific.
My usage of PhDs are a way to avoid ratiating a large amount of ego. Doctor of Philosophy I use because it indicates an individual who has studied at a high level about some fundamental nature of knowledge. There are obviously no Universities that issue these specific Phds, but it is in my opinion a better term to use than let's say 'Expert in Wows', as that portrays a larger amount of ego because the language is simpler.
The reasoning for 'PhD in Schizophrenics' is coupled to my work in researching topics that would lable you. In higher levels of language words like 'Deranged' would be used, in lower language levels it would be 'skizo'. A compromise between these levels was made. If you feel it is not appropriate for the forum I am glad to revoke my PhDs or define them in a better way, as I am not on this forum to make fun of anyone.
6
General Discussion / Re: Reported conspiracy
« on: October 16, 2022, 06:29:11 am »
If you like you can use the word Racism with a capital R to emphasize that it is not the general skin color thing but a term used in this forum.
I have conducted the change in my research post to better emphasize what I was trying to mean, you put it in a better wording. I am also trying to learn the forum better so that my work can be interpreted in a clearer way.
7
Debates, Interviews / Re: Mafia conspiracy
« on: October 16, 2022, 06:25:15 am »
I will make use of my free time to revise the mafia conspiracy into a better work, there is obviously too many flaws according to the Guru with a capital G. This way we can avoid persuing war and other nonsensical actions.
8
General Discussion / Reported conspiracy
« on: October 15, 2022, 06:14:03 pm »
Reported conspiracy
Description: You lose karma (be reported) at a higher rate while playing either one of the following two classes: Submarines and Carriers. This occurs in most games and is often portrayed as a ‘good act’ by the community.
Rarity: Extremely common
Severity: Mild
Example: Losing multiple levels of karma after a single battle. Receiving personal messages filled with threats. Public shaming in all/team chat.
I have two images that I managed to capture the conspiracy in effect, first being the score and the second being amount of reports received.
https://imgur.com/a/edrY3Mi
Ways to reproduce (method):
1) Select a submarine or Carrier
2) Select battle type with enemy players being human players (example Randoms/Ranked/Clan-battle)
3) Play matches and monitor if 'reports received' occurs after the match.
Comments:
This is a blatant occurance of typical 'wows-community' where a class is disproportionately being exposed to Racism.
What are your thought about this conspiracy? Have you experienced anything like this?
Description: You lose karma (be reported) at a higher rate while playing either one of the following two classes: Submarines and Carriers. This occurs in most games and is often portrayed as a ‘good act’ by the community.
Rarity: Extremely common
Severity: Mild
Example: Losing multiple levels of karma after a single battle. Receiving personal messages filled with threats. Public shaming in all/team chat.
I have two images that I managed to capture the conspiracy in effect, first being the score and the second being amount of reports received.
https://imgur.com/a/edrY3Mi
Ways to reproduce (method):
1) Select a submarine or Carrier
2) Select battle type with enemy players being human players (example Randoms/Ranked/Clan-battle)
3) Play matches and monitor if 'reports received' occurs after the match.
Comments:
This is a blatant occurance of typical 'wows-community' where a class is disproportionately being exposed to Racism.
What are your thought about this conspiracy? Have you experienced anything like this?
9
Debates, Interviews / Re: Mafia conspiracy
« on: October 15, 2022, 06:03:18 pm »
I will be brutal in my response because I am looking to sharing more research on this forum and minimize time spent 'debating'. It is not polite to ignore someone in a forum, so I will take my time in my response.
1) I do not agree. The definition is acceptable but not perfect, it can be left up to interpretation of its uses which I have done. This is exactly what lawyers do.
2) Everything I write is of benefit, the wows mafia describes what is occuring in this game. Do you know if I will not use it for the future? There is no need to be judgemental of others.
3) World of Warships and World of Tanks have never stated the word Mafia, it is of my own creation. Isac Newton didn't take the definition or application of gravity from nowhere, he figured it out and published it as research. I intend to do the same.
4) Destroyers do not feel remorse because they are not witnesses of their crimes. I determine this from them being unspotted or using 'illegal' tactics for their killings.
5) "...qualities such as concealment distance, long range torpedos and decent firepower (mostly from fire chance)." It is used as an example of a quality of which they possess. So in this sense it is accurate, because some destroyers have either one of more of these listed.
6) Yes, because they have the tools for each engagement. The combination of low concealment range, torpedoes and/or guns make them suited for against each class. This is not the case with other classes. Here is a rundown on the matchups for the destroyers:
DD vs Sub: DDs can use depth charges and are nimble enough to dodge torpedos. The concealment of both are equal.
DD vs DD: Equal fight, luck and matchup (which dd vs which) determines the outcome.
DD vs cruiser: Concealment difference in favour of the DD. DD uses torps (hydro doesn't help since it doesn't last forever).
DD vs BB: Same as cruiser but guns are more devastating since BBs have slow reload.
DD vs CV: Concealment and nimblesness favours the DD. If the DD remained unspotted for long enough he can sneak up on the carrier.
7) Destroyers have perfectly workable guns, some are better than others yes. There are aspects to consider why having slow guns can still be a benefit. It's called 'tradeoffs'. Consider your example of fighting against a BB: DDs have small guns but a small ship, they fire fast and the ship is nimble. It means that the DD can outmanouver (dodge every salvo from the BB) and continuously fire for small but consistent damage (HE-pens and fires). Larger ships, like cruisers, have better firepower but suffer from inability to dodge and will take more damage than DDs. BBs versus BBs will take the longest time, because unless one ship is broadside (able to take citadels) the damage must be relied on from overpens, normal pens from AP or pens + fires from HE (both cruisers and destroyers do this better).
8: Battleships have guns but if the target is undetected there is no way he can hit him, the BB dies to torpedoes. The DD can stay unspotted forever since he has good detection and faster speed than BBs. The consumables you listed are only temporary in their action time. Radars doesn't last long enough to kill the DD (the DD already knows this counter and will dodge the shells when being spotted, as the radars only last long enough for 1 or 2 salvos at best). The hydro is maximum 6km range (german battleships), which is just further than the smallest detection range of DDs (DD can stay outside this zone with ease). Torpedoes often do not have the range required to hit dds (some are short range only, Schlieffen is exception with 13.5km, but these are slow in reload and in the water). Secondaries cannot target (and thus hit) ships which are not spotted (DD stays outside detection range). For gun-focused DDs (or those with no torpedos), you engage the BB from long range to avoid secondaries/torpedos. Guns only shoot every 30s (some are better but not better than 20s) and you time the dodge with this timer.
9) The word 'Always' should be used because it is a part of the English language. The word 'Better' should be used because it is a part of the English language. These words should be used because they are appropriate. 1 better DD can be the difference between win/loss if you hold other variables constant, which in science we do.
10) I disagree. A better DD can be a determining factor.
11) Agreed. The image was provided from a colleauge of mine, it does not contain a Gurka division but instead 3 'purple' DDs. The example should have not been exampled.
13) Disagree. As I have previously stated, the 'soup' is a tool for conveying meaning, not more, not less. Even if it is not suggested there is nothing stopping me from using it, of which I have stated it is not the same reasons that you believe the Wows-community uses it for. Having the 'info' on my screen would make my screen extremely racist, since it shows me all different kinds of colours. See the following image:
https://imgur.com/a/Pi6bzFa
Your comprehension of colours make you racist. Are traffic lights racist because we value the colours differently? Green means go red mean stop. Applying the colour palette to racism is dumb and should be avoided since doing so will make the entire world (that's filled with colours) wrong. One way to avoid this could be to travel to 1950 since then there was no colours (only black and white).
14) Better wording would have been: 'Time consuming'.
15) You don't suggest it, but the English language does. Politeness is how you build relations with individuals you previously did not have any interactions with.
16) Disagree. I have never once stated that I am using 'historical data' to determine treatment of other people. The feelings are against colours (example red, green, blue), not peoples. I am assuming you are trying to frame me by connecting the 'soup' with 'stats' and 'performance' and other nonsense that you have already told us is not to be thought about from the Wows-community. You are assuming I'm treating people differently because of colours/stats/racism even though I never stated this, it only exists in your head because you have made this arbitrary connection, which would make you have the same line of thought as the Wows-community. That is blatant racism of thought.
17) Disagree, I do not agree to being used as an example of the Wows-community since I am not of member of that community. You are making a connection between words and meanings that do not compute together. Does a Doctor in Philosopy in mental illneses make fun of his patients? Assuming that your opponent is playing foul is not sportsmanlike, if a fotball team is constantly accusing enemy teams of doping then you are in constant fear that he might beat you. Accusating out of thin air, or as in your example, crying-wolf, should not be practised since it is equivalent of following the wows-community.
1) I do not agree. The definition is acceptable but not perfect, it can be left up to interpretation of its uses which I have done. This is exactly what lawyers do.
2) Everything I write is of benefit, the wows mafia describes what is occuring in this game. Do you know if I will not use it for the future? There is no need to be judgemental of others.
3) World of Warships and World of Tanks have never stated the word Mafia, it is of my own creation. Isac Newton didn't take the definition or application of gravity from nowhere, he figured it out and published it as research. I intend to do the same.
4) Destroyers do not feel remorse because they are not witnesses of their crimes. I determine this from them being unspotted or using 'illegal' tactics for their killings.
5) "...qualities such as concealment distance, long range torpedos and decent firepower (mostly from fire chance)." It is used as an example of a quality of which they possess. So in this sense it is accurate, because some destroyers have either one of more of these listed.
6) Yes, because they have the tools for each engagement. The combination of low concealment range, torpedoes and/or guns make them suited for against each class. This is not the case with other classes. Here is a rundown on the matchups for the destroyers:
DD vs Sub: DDs can use depth charges and are nimble enough to dodge torpedos. The concealment of both are equal.
DD vs DD: Equal fight, luck and matchup (which dd vs which) determines the outcome.
DD vs cruiser: Concealment difference in favour of the DD. DD uses torps (hydro doesn't help since it doesn't last forever).
DD vs BB: Same as cruiser but guns are more devastating since BBs have slow reload.
DD vs CV: Concealment and nimblesness favours the DD. If the DD remained unspotted for long enough he can sneak up on the carrier.
7) Destroyers have perfectly workable guns, some are better than others yes. There are aspects to consider why having slow guns can still be a benefit. It's called 'tradeoffs'. Consider your example of fighting against a BB: DDs have small guns but a small ship, they fire fast and the ship is nimble. It means that the DD can outmanouver (dodge every salvo from the BB) and continuously fire for small but consistent damage (HE-pens and fires). Larger ships, like cruisers, have better firepower but suffer from inability to dodge and will take more damage than DDs. BBs versus BBs will take the longest time, because unless one ship is broadside (able to take citadels) the damage must be relied on from overpens, normal pens from AP or pens + fires from HE (both cruisers and destroyers do this better).
8: Battleships have guns but if the target is undetected there is no way he can hit him, the BB dies to torpedoes. The DD can stay unspotted forever since he has good detection and faster speed than BBs. The consumables you listed are only temporary in their action time. Radars doesn't last long enough to kill the DD (the DD already knows this counter and will dodge the shells when being spotted, as the radars only last long enough for 1 or 2 salvos at best). The hydro is maximum 6km range (german battleships), which is just further than the smallest detection range of DDs (DD can stay outside this zone with ease). Torpedoes often do not have the range required to hit dds (some are short range only, Schlieffen is exception with 13.5km, but these are slow in reload and in the water). Secondaries cannot target (and thus hit) ships which are not spotted (DD stays outside detection range). For gun-focused DDs (or those with no torpedos), you engage the BB from long range to avoid secondaries/torpedos. Guns only shoot every 30s (some are better but not better than 20s) and you time the dodge with this timer.
9) The word 'Always' should be used because it is a part of the English language. The word 'Better' should be used because it is a part of the English language. These words should be used because they are appropriate. 1 better DD can be the difference between win/loss if you hold other variables constant, which in science we do.
10) I disagree. A better DD can be a determining factor.
11) Agreed. The image was provided from a colleauge of mine, it does not contain a Gurka division but instead 3 'purple' DDs. The example should have not been exampled.
13) Disagree. As I have previously stated, the 'soup' is a tool for conveying meaning, not more, not less. Even if it is not suggested there is nothing stopping me from using it, of which I have stated it is not the same reasons that you believe the Wows-community uses it for. Having the 'info' on my screen would make my screen extremely racist, since it shows me all different kinds of colours. See the following image:
https://imgur.com/a/Pi6bzFa
Your comprehension of colours make you racist. Are traffic lights racist because we value the colours differently? Green means go red mean stop. Applying the colour palette to racism is dumb and should be avoided since doing so will make the entire world (that's filled with colours) wrong. One way to avoid this could be to travel to 1950 since then there was no colours (only black and white).
14) Better wording would have been: 'Time consuming'.
15) You don't suggest it, but the English language does. Politeness is how you build relations with individuals you previously did not have any interactions with.
16) Disagree. I have never once stated that I am using 'historical data' to determine treatment of other people. The feelings are against colours (example red, green, blue), not peoples. I am assuming you are trying to frame me by connecting the 'soup' with 'stats' and 'performance' and other nonsense that you have already told us is not to be thought about from the Wows-community. You are assuming I'm treating people differently because of colours/stats/racism even though I never stated this, it only exists in your head because you have made this arbitrary connection, which would make you have the same line of thought as the Wows-community. That is blatant racism of thought.
17) Disagree, I do not agree to being used as an example of the Wows-community since I am not of member of that community. You are making a connection between words and meanings that do not compute together. Does a Doctor in Philosopy in mental illneses make fun of his patients? Assuming that your opponent is playing foul is not sportsmanlike, if a fotball team is constantly accusing enemy teams of doping then you are in constant fear that he might beat you. Accusating out of thin air, or as in your example, crying-wolf, should not be practised since it is equivalent of following the wows-community.
10
Debates, Interviews / Re: Mafia conspiracy
« on: October 14, 2022, 06:23:55 pm »
After reading your response to my work I have undertaken thoughts, considerations and steps to improve myself for the betterment of the scientific community. I want to methodically go through all your points on common grounds so we can all learn, because there seems to have been misunderstading and room for improvement.
On the topic of 'Karma Soup'. It was not properly conveyed in the reserach why I used the 'soup' as a scientific indicator for the Mafia conspiracy. There are many reasons for this, which runs down double-fold. Personally, I use the Matchmaking Monitor, otherwise shortened to 'MM', as a visual indicator that is tied to danger levels. It can be easily used just visually, since red often means danger and something to avoid, while green is the opposite and should perceived as something positive. This can be applied to normal situations, like a traffic-light (red, yellow, green). You want to go on green but stop on red? If I were to apply your line of thinking, a team consisting of 'red' and 'yellow' would be considered a tomato soup (filled with traces of pasta). 'Purple' on the other hand can be seen as odd, especially given that it has a gradient of colours, because it doesn't equate to any special matching against another colour. Eggplant is the most equivalent, and I believe it should be avoided (it gives my stomach a run for its money). Whatever soup is being served will be interpreted with different feelings. Tomato soup with celery or pasta will fill your stomach differently, taste different depending on the spices used, it all makes sense in my head. Your comments about me being a 'stat-racist' seem arbitrary, since I am not a believer of such nonsense. The usage of the 'soup' is simply for conveying feelings, not more, not less.
The other aspect for the lack of explanations is my previous exposure to other colleauges within my field of work (in WoWs reserach). Terms like 'Mafia' applied to the class 'destroyers' may seem arbitrary, because in my original post it was. Often I use interchangeable theories and definitions that make sense in your head but not in writing unless properly described. This is obviously a shortcoming of the researched posted, as it is simply made and not within University guidelines (which should be used in interpretation and guidance, but obviously isn't a perfect method). The term originated from a battle (and interaction) with a particular enemy who hated the DDs in our team.
What can be intersting from this interaction is new terms on my end. 'Karma rapist' is something I have never heard of before. From any point of view it can be considered as a horrible act, to violate another entity with an engagement. In a buddhist point of view, we can interpret the idea of this. "Everything is unsatisfactory, unsatisfactory depends on the desire, the unsatisfactory can cease, there is a way out of dissatisfaction." This can be transalted into 4 steps for the 'Karma rapist':
1) The principal is disturbed by lack of satisfaction
2) The principal feels unsatisfied due to lack of his inner needs (degenerate ways of thinking).
3) The principal can better himself, but deosn't do anything to fulfill this goal (he might not even see it) and instead go for devious acts.
4) The principal doesn't see the way out of degenerate ways of thinking / acting.
It will probably also depend on how heavy the karma is for the principal, maybe he had hurt other sentient beings in past lives and is being haunted by evil spirits.
Continuing, your suggestions about mental exercises is already of great help. Even without subscribing to any trainings, this forum is already a mental exercise in itself. This is beneficial for both logics, deeper thoughts, and 'alternative'. In some sense, your website can be described as a 'yoga exercise' of the eastern type (not physical, but mental).
I do believe that using gurus to improve can be beneficial, this response is an example of that. I will continue to contribute to the scientific community with following research, it will come so have something to look forward to.
Lastly, what kind of video of enlightenment can you provide? I am interested.
On the topic of 'Karma Soup'. It was not properly conveyed in the reserach why I used the 'soup' as a scientific indicator for the Mafia conspiracy. There are many reasons for this, which runs down double-fold. Personally, I use the Matchmaking Monitor, otherwise shortened to 'MM', as a visual indicator that is tied to danger levels. It can be easily used just visually, since red often means danger and something to avoid, while green is the opposite and should perceived as something positive. This can be applied to normal situations, like a traffic-light (red, yellow, green). You want to go on green but stop on red? If I were to apply your line of thinking, a team consisting of 'red' and 'yellow' would be considered a tomato soup (filled with traces of pasta). 'Purple' on the other hand can be seen as odd, especially given that it has a gradient of colours, because it doesn't equate to any special matching against another colour. Eggplant is the most equivalent, and I believe it should be avoided (it gives my stomach a run for its money). Whatever soup is being served will be interpreted with different feelings. Tomato soup with celery or pasta will fill your stomach differently, taste different depending on the spices used, it all makes sense in my head. Your comments about me being a 'stat-racist' seem arbitrary, since I am not a believer of such nonsense. The usage of the 'soup' is simply for conveying feelings, not more, not less.
The other aspect for the lack of explanations is my previous exposure to other colleauges within my field of work (in WoWs reserach). Terms like 'Mafia' applied to the class 'destroyers' may seem arbitrary, because in my original post it was. Often I use interchangeable theories and definitions that make sense in your head but not in writing unless properly described. This is obviously a shortcoming of the researched posted, as it is simply made and not within University guidelines (which should be used in interpretation and guidance, but obviously isn't a perfect method). The term originated from a battle (and interaction) with a particular enemy who hated the DDs in our team.
What can be intersting from this interaction is new terms on my end. 'Karma rapist' is something I have never heard of before. From any point of view it can be considered as a horrible act, to violate another entity with an engagement. In a buddhist point of view, we can interpret the idea of this. "Everything is unsatisfactory, unsatisfactory depends on the desire, the unsatisfactory can cease, there is a way out of dissatisfaction." This can be transalted into 4 steps for the 'Karma rapist':
1) The principal is disturbed by lack of satisfaction
2) The principal feels unsatisfied due to lack of his inner needs (degenerate ways of thinking).
3) The principal can better himself, but deosn't do anything to fulfill this goal (he might not even see it) and instead go for devious acts.
4) The principal doesn't see the way out of degenerate ways of thinking / acting.
It will probably also depend on how heavy the karma is for the principal, maybe he had hurt other sentient beings in past lives and is being haunted by evil spirits.
Continuing, your suggestions about mental exercises is already of great help. Even without subscribing to any trainings, this forum is already a mental exercise in itself. This is beneficial for both logics, deeper thoughts, and 'alternative'. In some sense, your website can be described as a 'yoga exercise' of the eastern type (not physical, but mental).
I do believe that using gurus to improve can be beneficial, this response is an example of that. I will continue to contribute to the scientific community with following research, it will come so have something to look forward to.
Lastly, what kind of video of enlightenment can you provide? I am interested.
11
Debates, Interviews / Mafia conspiracy
« on: October 14, 2022, 10:14:46 am »
Mafia - noun
Definition of Mafia
- a secret criminal society
- a criminal organization associated with a particular traffic
In World of Warships the Mafia counts as the destroyers. They hunt down every class with no remorse. They function as the determining factor in matches due to qualities such as concealment distance, long range torpedos and decent firepower (mostly from fire chance). The primary target of the Mafia is the Battleships, who have no counters against the Mafia. It runs in my blood.
Mafia conspiracy
Description: The enemy team will always have better DDs than your team. This results in fast losses since you lose on all spotting & capping since the team is allergic to torpedoes and mafia.
Rarity: Uncommon
Severity: Unbearable
Example: The triple GURKA division in T10 DDs (Småland, Ragnar & Sherman) will dumpster your 3 undivisioned DDs (17900 shima, Z52 that won’t use hydro & Gearing who donates his smoke). Your team will immediately run away to the map border and thus give up all map control. Usually the subject experiences a mind break that causes them to close down the game.
Image as an illustration: https://imgur.com/a/QA28Opf
It is not necessary to have any specific clan play the division, one team of DDs has to completelly stomp the other side. It is also very hard to test this theory out, you only have to find the matches by pure chance as you cannot determine what teammates/enemies you will have. I hope these findings are interesting, a lot of work went into this one. King regards.
Definition of Mafia
- a secret criminal society
- a criminal organization associated with a particular traffic
In World of Warships the Mafia counts as the destroyers. They hunt down every class with no remorse. They function as the determining factor in matches due to qualities such as concealment distance, long range torpedos and decent firepower (mostly from fire chance). The primary target of the Mafia is the Battleships, who have no counters against the Mafia. It runs in my blood.
Mafia conspiracy
Description: The enemy team will always have better DDs than your team. This results in fast losses since you lose on all spotting & capping since the team is allergic to torpedoes and mafia.
Rarity: Uncommon
Severity: Unbearable
Example: The triple GURKA division in T10 DDs (Småland, Ragnar & Sherman) will dumpster your 3 undivisioned DDs (17900 shima, Z52 that won’t use hydro & Gearing who donates his smoke). Your team will immediately run away to the map border and thus give up all map control. Usually the subject experiences a mind break that causes them to close down the game.
Image as an illustration: https://imgur.com/a/QA28Opf
It is not necessary to have any specific clan play the division, one team of DDs has to completelly stomp the other side. It is also very hard to test this theory out, you only have to find the matches by pure chance as you cannot determine what teammates/enemies you will have. I hope these findings are interesting, a lot of work went into this one. King regards.
12
General Discussion / Re: Smokefire conspiracy
« on: October 13, 2022, 03:29:31 pm »
Hickerman, I agree on the point that the smokefire conspiracy is about when the subject is inside the smoke, not shooting at it.
Here is an illustration with the subject is coloured in blue:
https://imgur.com/4aKY9dE
I hope there was not too much of a misunderstanding,
King regards.
Here is an illustration with the subject is coloured in blue:
https://imgur.com/4aKY9dE
I hope there was not too much of a misunderstanding,
King regards.
13
General Discussion / Smokefire conspiracy
« on: October 13, 2022, 05:41:07 am »
Greetings, I will publish another one of my findings. I hope this will enlighten us all.
Smokefire conspiracy
Description: Whenever you are in a smokescreen the enemy will always blindshoot you and hit you. This typically occurs when other teammates are closeby and spotted (not in the smoke), in which case the enemy will still target the undetected ship (the subject).
Rarity: Common
Severity: Severe
Example: Typically occurs against DDs and smoke-cruisers, often resulting in fires or citadels taken. Severity level increases to Extremely severe whenever you are devstruck because of the blindshooting or when you are taking damage at low HP-levels. Flamu is the origin of the blindshooting for the EU-server. Torpedoes hitting the smokescreen does not count into the smokefire conspiracy.
I notice that this happens more often the older the game gets. I remember that back at release nobody would dare to shoot into the smokescreen, not even at close distances (3km), but nowadays individuals are shooting at the smoke even though spotted ships are within firing range (not necessarily further away). What do you think about this? King regards.
Smokefire conspiracy
Description: Whenever you are in a smokescreen the enemy will always blindshoot you and hit you. This typically occurs when other teammates are closeby and spotted (not in the smoke), in which case the enemy will still target the undetected ship (the subject).
Rarity: Common
Severity: Severe
Example: Typically occurs against DDs and smoke-cruisers, often resulting in fires or citadels taken. Severity level increases to Extremely severe whenever you are devstruck because of the blindshooting or when you are taking damage at low HP-levels. Flamu is the origin of the blindshooting for the EU-server. Torpedoes hitting the smokescreen does not count into the smokefire conspiracy.
I notice that this happens more often the older the game gets. I remember that back at release nobody would dare to shoot into the smokescreen, not even at close distances (3km), but nowadays individuals are shooting at the smoke even though spotted ships are within firing range (not necessarily further away). What do you think about this? King regards.
14
Debates, Interviews / Re: Debate 6
« on: October 12, 2022, 11:59:48 am »
I agree about there being a misunderstanding in the communication on this topic. The interpretation was that you are a firm believer of the Coal conspiracy, it was stated as "i get less coal those days fro mthe loot boxes...", thus I decided to answer it fully in a mannerful manner. Though this can be made from human error, it is important to conduct peer-review with each other, an old teacher of mine would have called this incident an 'pedagogical error'. For now I understand the discussion is completed, since we stand on even ground. Kind regards.
15
Debates, Interviews / Debate 6
« on: October 12, 2022, 05:42:06 am »The second conspiracy is that i get less coal those days now fro mthe loot boxes compared what i used to get. Coal income changed after they introduced boosters.
Greetings,
I think your experience with gold members can be counted into my work on the Ranked conspiracy, however it is still being finalized.
I do not agree with the level of coal gain from daily containers, it is simple mathematics.
The odds of receiving coal are:
100% chance for 400 coal
5% for 400 coal
25% for 400 coal
Using the Expected return formula the expected value of a coal container is: 400*1 + 400*0.05 + 400*0.25 = 520 coal.
Adding 10% from clan bonus: 520*1.1 = 572
Times amount of coal containers per day from XP: 572*3 = 1716
Over a longer period of time it should be this number minimum, but sometimes more given other containers also have chances for coal.
I am believer of statistics since I had conducted droprate research from last years christmas containers, the percentages were correlated with those given by WG themselves. If you do not agree I am fine with this, but I feel comfortable with mathematics.
King regards.
Pages: [1] 2